Pediatric Early Warning Scores (PEWS): How They Improve Child Safety and Hospital Outcomes

Pediatric patient safety remains a global healthcare priority. Among the most effective tools for early detection of clinical deterioration in hospitalized children is the Pediatric Early Warning Scores (PEWS). Used worldwide, PEWS empowers healthcare teams to intervene before a child’s condition becomes critical—saving lives and improving long-term outcomes.

What is Pediatric Early Warning Scores (PEWS)?

Pediatric Early Warning Scores (PEWS) are clinical tools designed to monitor hospitalized children for signs of deterioration (Lee et al., 2024). These systems help healthcare providers identify at-risk patients early and initiate timely interventions through structured assessments and escalation protocols.

(For more background, see our blog on the importance of Early Warning Scores.)

Purpose of PEWS

The primary goal of PEWS is to detect early signs of physiological decline in children, enabling proactive intervention and reducing preventable emergencies such as in-hospital cardiac arrests or unplanned ICU transfers.

📊 Studies show that clinical deterioration in hospitalized pediatric patients can increase mortality rates by 5%–15% (Rosman et al., 2019).

How PEWS Works

PEWS systems involve periodic assessments of a child’s (Mills et al., 2021):

a. Vital signs (heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation)
b. Physical exam findings
c. Behavior and level of consciousness

Each deviation from normal is scored, and a higher cumulative score signals an increased risk of deterioration, triggering actions through a clear escalation protocol.

Basic Flow of PEWS system, covering the scoring, escalation protocol, and clinical actions:

1. Scoring System

(Each hospital or system may vary slightly, but generally PEWS uses three key parameters:)

a. Behavior (alertness, crying, response to parents)

b. Cardiovascular (heart rate, capillary refill, color)

c. Respiratory (respiratory rate, oxygen requirement, work of breathing)

Each parameter is scored from 0 (normal) to 3 (severely abnormal).
Total PEWS score = sum of the 3 parameter scores.

 
2. Score Interpretation and Escalation Protocol

Total PEWS Score

Interpretation

Escalation

Clinical Action

0–2

Low Risk

Routine Monitoring

Continue standard care

3–4

Moderate Risk

Notify Primary Nurse and Doctor

Increase monitoring frequency, reassess

5–6

High Risk

Immediate Review by Senior Clinician

Initiate interventions (e.g., oxygen, fluids). Consider ICU consult.

≥7

Critical / Emergency

Rapid Response or MET Call

Activate emergency team, transfer to PICU

An example of a PEWS sheet used in Indonesia can be seen here: EWS Anak dan Bayi.

 
3. Clinical Actions Based on Score

🔵 Score 0–2 (Low Risk)

    1. Monitor according to routine
    2. Reassess if condition changes

🟡 Score 3–4 (Moderate Risk)

    1. Notify attending nurse/doctor
    2. Reassess patient within 30–60 minutes
    3. Start basic supportive measures if needed

🟠 Score 5–6 (High Risk)

    1. Urgent review by a senior doctor (within 15–30 minutes)
    2. Implement medical interventions (oxygen, IV access, labs)
    3. Prepare for possible ICU escalation

🔴 Score ≥7 (Critical Risk)

    1. Immediate activation of Rapid Response Team (RRT) or Medical Emergency Team (MET)
    2. Full resuscitation, if needed
    3. Rapid transfer to ICU/PICU if required

 

While each hospital may customize the parameters, scoring, and escalation protocols based on their specific needs, the general flow remains consistent. It typically involves an initial assessment, scoring based on key clinical indicators, interpretation of the total score, and corresponding clinical actions ranging from routine monitoring to activating an emergency response team. This basic framework helps ensure timely interventions to improve patient outcomes.

Healthcare team urgently responding to pediatric emergency in hospital corridor, illustrating real-time application of Pediatric Early Warning Score (PEWS) for critical care escalation.
A hospital medical team rushes to a pediatric emergency, demonstrating the importance of timely response enabled by Pediatric Early Warning Scores (PEWS) in improving child patient outcomes. (Photo by My Ocean Production on Shutterstock)

Roles during PEWS Response

Key roles of the multidisciplinary team in responding to PEWS alerts include:

Nurses
  1. Conduct reassessment and verify vital signs
  2. Calculate and update the PEWS score
  3. Notify the physician or rapid response team as per escalation protocol
  4. Administer immediate supportive care (e.g., oxygen, IV access)
  5. Monitor the patient closely and document all interventions
Physicians (Pediatricians or Attending Doctors)
  1. Assess the child upon escalation
  2. Confirm clinical deterioration and diagnose underlying issues
  3. Initiate urgent medical interventions (e.g., medications, fluids)
  4. Determine if intensive care consultation or transfer is needed
Respiratory Therapists
  1. Evaluate airway and breathing status
  2. Provide oxygen therapy, nebulizations, or assist with non-invasive or invasive ventilation
  3. Support airway management during critical events
Pharmacists
  1. Prepare and dispense emergency medications rapidly
  2. Advise on correct dosing for pediatric patients
  3. Support the team in medication reconciliation during escalation
Other Specialists (e.g., Pediatric Intensivists, Critical Care Specialists)
  1. Lead management for severely ill or complex cases
  2. Oversee interventions such as advanced airway management, invasive monitoring, or PICU transfer
  3. Collaborate with the primary team for continued critical care

Benefits of PEWS in Pediatric Care

  1. Early identification of deteriorating patients
  2. Reduced PICU utilization
  3. Fewer in-hospital cardiac arrests
  4. Lower mortality rates in high-income settings
  5. Enhanced communication and decision-making among clinical teams

PEWS in Action: Global Examples

NU-PEWS (Naresuan University Pediatric Early Warning Score)

Developed in 2020 at Naresuan University Hospital, Thailand, NU-PEWS was tailored for resource-appropriate care using the following indicators:

✅ Consciousness, Heart rate, Capillary refill time, Blood pressure, Respiratory rate, Retraction, Oxygen saturation, Body temperature

Each item is scored from 0–3, with total scores ranging from 0 to 20.

Effectiveness:
Research shows NU-PEWS is a highly accurate tool for detecting deterioration across most medical conditions (except neurological disorders). It has demonstrated greater sensitivity and specificity compared to other scoring tools. 

BC PEWS (British Columbia Pediatric Early Warning System)

Created by Child Health BC, the BC PEWS initiative offers a standardized, province-wide framework to identify and respond to deterioration in pediatric patients.

Key Components:

    1. PEWS scoring system
    2. PEWS flowsheet
    3. Situational awareness cues
    4. Escalation protocols
    5. SBAR communication framework

Impact:

    1. Implemented in 50+ inpatient hospitals
    2. Expanded to 97 emergency departments and First Nations health centers
    3. Research pilot studies show improved outcomes and system-wide efficiency

Modified Pediatric Early Warning System (PEWS) at Unidad Nacional de Oncología Pediátrica (UNOP)

This study describes the successful implementation of a modified PEWS in UNOP, a pediatric oncology hospital in Guatemala, a resource-limited setting. After implementation, there was 100% compliance with PEWS documentation and an error rate of less than 10%.

✅Key results included:

    1. 5 high PEWS events identified per week
    2. 30% of patients appropriately transferred to higher levels of care
    3. 93% of patients needing PICU transfer had abnormal PEWS before transfer
    4. Clinical deterioration events decreased from 9.3 to 6.5 per 1000 patient-days
    5. An 18% reduction in PICU patient-days per year (from 1376 to 1088 days)

Indonesia

PEWS has been widely adopted in many hospitals across the country, particularly after the Indonesian Hospital Accreditation Commission (KARS) incorporated it into the National Accreditation Standards (SNARS) Edition 1.1 in 2019.

An example of PEWS implementation in Indonesia can be seen in a study at RSIA Muhammadiyah Probolinggo City. The study, published in STRADA: Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan (2022), investigated the relationship between compliance with PEWS application, response time, and patient safety. Conducted among 32 nurses, the study found that 78% adhered to the PEWS protocol, achieved rapid response times, and maintained patient safety standards. The research highlights how PEWS supports early detection of pediatric deterioration and promotes timely clinical intervention.

Limitations & Implementation Considerations

Despite their benefits, PEWS systems vary in structure and effectiveness depending on: hospital resources, staff training levels, and patient populations.

There is still no global consensus on core PEWS components, scoring thresholds, or escalation triggers. Successful implementation depends on customization, staff training, and continuous evaluation (Fuijkschot et al., 2023 and Roland et al., 2022).

With these, healthcare professionals—especially nurses—are expected to understand the principles of PEWS and follow its implementation guidelines. To ensure proper application, they are encouraged to attend seminars and workshops focused on Pediatric Early Warning Scores (Rusmawati et al., 2022).

Some of the key responsibilities of nurses in PEWS, include the following:

1. Patient Assessment and Monitoring:

Nurses conduct physical assessments, including taking vital signs and observing capillary refill time. They also assess the patient’s behavior and general condition. 

2. PEWS Score Calculation:

Nurses use the PEWS scoring system to quantify the severity of a child’s condition based on the collected vital signs and observations. This helps in identifying patients who are at higher risk of deterioration. 

3. Communication and Collaboration:

Nurses communicate the patient’s PEWS score and clinical status to other members of the healthcare team, including doctors and respiratory therapists, ensuring everyone is aware of the patient’s condition.

4. Patient Advocacy and Education:

Nurses advocate for their patients’ needs and ensure appropriate interventions are initiated based on the PEWS score and clinical findings. They may also educate patients and families about the PEWS system and their child’s condition. 

5. Resource Review and Implementation:

Nurses may be involved in reviewing resources available for patient care and implementing strategies to improve PEWS scoring accuracy and effectiveness. 

6. Documentation and Reporting:

Nurses meticulously document all assessments, vital signs, PEWS scores, and any interventions provided in the patient’s chart. They also report any significant changes in the patient’s condition or adverse events to the appropriate personnel.

 

As pediatric hospitals face rising admissions, resource constraints, and evolving disease patterns, the use of PEWS is no longer optional—it’s essential. Hospitals that implement these systems are better positioned to reduce harm, act faster, and save lives.

Technology Integration in PEWS

Technology can further improve PEWS by leveraging advancements such as:

  1. AI Algorithms: Enhance early detection.
  2. Wearable Devices: Enable real-time vital sign monitoring.
  3. EHR Integration: Centralizes patient data for faster decision-making.
  4. Mobile Applications: Deliver bedside decision support and alerts.

For instance, real-time data automation and triggering alerts have been key factors in the acceptability and effectiveness of systems like DETECT e-PEWS.

 

Dynamic Electronic Tracking and Escalation to reduce critical Care Transfers (DETECT) e-PEWS

DETECT e-PEWS is an electronic observation and decision support system (Saron et al., 2022).

  1. It is uploaded onto iPods, iPads, or approved personal devices by Trust Information Governance.
  2. Healthcare professionals use it at the child’s bedside.
  3. After vital signs are recorded, an age-specific PEW score is automatically calculated.
  4. The system provides instant bedside decision support based on the score.
  5. Higher risk scores trigger escalating actions like:
  6. Increased frequency of monitoring,
  7. Requesting a medical review,
  8. Activation of the resuscitation team.
  9. iPods and iPads communicate with the hospital’s electronic information system, allowing real-time visibility of recorded data.
Medanets mobile app displaying Early Warning Score (EWS) dashboard for real-time Pediatric Early Warning Score (PEWS) tracking and clinical decision support.
Example: Medanets app interface showcasing EWS monitoring, enabling healthcare professionals to detect early signs of clinical deterioration using PEWS criteria. (Photo by medanets)

Take the Next Step with Zafyre

If you’re a healthcare professional working in pediatrics, emergency care, or critical care, mastering PEWS is vital.

📚 Zafyre offers an e-learning course on Early Warning Systems, featuring practical modules on Pediatric Early Warning Scores (PEWS)—aligned with international and local standards, SKP-accredited, and designed for clinical application.

👉 Explore the course here and elevate your readiness to respond before it’s too late.

References:
A. Studies on Pediatric Early Warning Scores Global Examples
  1. Agulnik, A., Mora Robles, L. N., Forbes, P. W., Soberanis Vasquez, D. J., Mack, R., Antillon-Klussmann, F., Kleinman, M., & Rodriguez-Galindo, C. (2017). Improved outcomes after successful implementation of a pediatric early warning system (PEWS) in a resource-limited pediatric oncology hospital. Cancer, 123(15), 2965–2974. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30664 
  2. McElroy, T., Swartz, E. N., Hassani, K., Waibel, S., Tuff, Y., Marshall, C., Chan, R., Wensley, D., & O’Donnell, M. (2019). Implementation study of a 5-component pediatric early warning system (PEWS) in an emergency department in British Columbia, Canada, to inform provincial scale up. BMC Emergency Medicine, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-019-0287-5 
  3. Phuaksaman, C., & Sukboonthong, P. (2022). Performance of Modified Pediatric Early Warning Score in General Medical Conditions and Disease Subgroups. Global Pediatric Health, 9, 2333794X2211074. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333794×221107487 
  4. Rusmawati, A., Ellina, A. D., Fawzi, A., & Musa, K. lImron. (2022). Pediatric Early Warning Score (PEWS) Application Compliance with Response Time and Patient Safety. STRADA Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan, 11(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.30994/sjik.v11i1.889 
B. Other Studies
  1. Carter, B., Saron, H., Siner, S., Preston, J., Peak, M., Mehta, F., Lane, S., Lambert, C., Jones, D., Hughes, H., Harris, J., Evans, L., Dee, S., Eyton-Chong, C.-K., Sefton, G., & Carrol, E. D. (2022). Health professionals’ initial experiences and perceptions of the acceptability of a whole-hospital, pro-active electronic paediatric early warning system (the DETECT study): a qualitative interview study. BMC Pediatrics, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03411-1 
  2. Child Health BC. (2025). Pediatric Early Warning System (PEWS). CHBC. https://www.childhealthbc.ca/initiatives/pediatric-early-warning-system-pews 
  3. Fuijkschot, J., Stevens, J., Teheux, L., de Loos, E., Rippen, H., Meurs, M., & de Groot, J. (2023). Development of the national Dutch PEWS: the challenge against heterogeneity and implementation difficulties of PEWS in the Netherlands. BMC Pediatrics, 23, 387. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-04219-3 
  4. Lee, J., Ciuchta, J. L., Weingarten-Arams, J., & Philips, K. (2024). Pediatric Early Warning Scores Before Rapid Response Poorly Predict Intensive Care Unit Transfers. Hospital Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2024-007864 
  5. Mills, D., Schmid, A., Najajreh, M., Al Nasser, A., Awwad, Y., Qattush, K., Monuteaux, M. C., Hudgins, J., Salman, Z., & Niescierenko, M. (2021). Implementation of a pediatric early warning score tool in a pediatric oncology Ward in Palestine. BMC Health Services Research, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07157-x 
  6. Roland, D., Powell, C., Lloyd, A., Trubey, R., Tume, L., Sefton, G., Huang, C., Taiyari, K., Strange, H., Jacob, N., Thomas-Jones, E., Hood, K., & Allen, D. (2022). Paediatric early warning systems: not a simple answer to a complex question. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 108(5), archdischild-2022-323951. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2022-323951 
  7. Rosman, S. L., Karangwa, V., Law, M., Monuteaux, M. C., Briscoe, C. D., & McCall, N. (2019). Provisional Validation of a Pediatric Early Warning Score for Resource-Limited Settings. Pediatrics, 143(5), e20183657. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-3657